Skip to content
EN

Language

Book consultation

Breast18 November 20257 min read

Round or anatomical? How to make a safe, well-matched choice of implant

Round or anatomical? It all fits together with the right placement.

The key points in brief

  • Fit beats shapeDecide in 6 steps (desired result, measuring, placement, shape, width & projection, incision), always following “width → projection → volume” – this helps prevent excessive width, harsh transitions and unstable-looking silhouettes. Three placement options (subglandular, dual plane, submuscular) have a decisive influence on the look.

  • The effect of “round” and “anatomical”Round implants can look very soft and natural in a dual plane position; the projection (from low to extra high) determines how prominent the décolleté appears. Anatomical implants calm the lower pole and help with thin soft-tissue coverage or asymmetries, but are more sensitive to rotation; rippling is a risk especially where there is little soft-tissue coverage.

  • Safety, access & healingAccess via the inframammary fold offers very good control over the position and reduces contact with germs; sterile procedures, a suitable size/surface and atraumatic technique can lower the risk of capsular reactions. The final look only becomes apparent after a few weeks – a support bra, UV protection and a gradual increase in strain stabilise the shape.

Why the “right” shape is never just a matter of shape

Many women start their research with the simple comparison of “round” or “anatomical”. In reality, the look is less often decided by the shape – and much more often by the fit: how wide is the breast base? How elastic is the skin? How much soft-tissue coverage lies over the implant? And on which “floor” will it sit later: above, partly or below the muscle? Only once these points are clear does the shape have its effect. Thinking only “teardrop = natural” or “round = done” falls short. Both can look harmonious – or not. What matters are placement, width and projection.

An example from practice: a round implant in a dual-plane position (upper part under the muscle, lower part under the glandular tissue) often creates a very soft upper contour. An anatomical implant of an unfavourable size, on the other hand, can appear wide and uneven despite its teardrop shape. The good news: with a careful analysis of the initial anatomy and a structured decision-making process, a result can be achieved that feels harmonious on the body – regardless of whether the final choice is “round” or “anatomical”.

Curious to know more?

Write to us and we will call you back:

ProvenExpert Top Recommendation 2026 for the Westfalenklinik98 %Recommendation rateon ProvenExpert
Book consultation

This page is protected by a privacy-friendly spam protection: the check runs in your browser, without tracking and without cookies.

Understanding implant shape: what “round” and “anatomical” actually do

Round implants distribute the volume evenly. Depending on the projection (low to extra-high), the forward “push” varies. In the right position, the pectoral muscle gently shapes the upper pole, and the décolleté can look fuller without appearing hard. Anatomical implants (teardrop-shaped) shift the fullness further downwards. The upper breast remains understated, while the lower breast looks fuller and calmer. This behaviour can be used to subtly balance asymmetrical or very slim initial situations.

What matters is the interaction of the parameters: wider implants fill out more to the side, high projections carry further forward, and thin soft-tissue coverage reveals implant edges more quickly. A sound decision therefore reduces the question of shape to its core: “Which silhouette do I want at rest and in motion – and which combination of position, width and projection creates exactly this silhouette?”

Quick check: when round implants have the edge

  • You would like a visible but soft décolleté.
  • There is a lack of volume at the top (e.g. after pregnancy or weight loss).
  • A rotation should remain visually unproblematic.
  • It should be possible to choose the projection flexibly, from subtle to expressive.

Quick check: when anatomical implants have the advantage

  • The contour should look particularly calm – with the emphasis on the lower pole.
  • Very slim soft-tissue coverage in the upper area calls for restraint.
  • There is an asymmetrical initial situation that is to be shaped in a targeted way.
  • The desired look deliberately avoids a strong push-up effect.

Westfalenklinik Dortmund, waiting area of the specialist clinic

Round or anatomical implants: which shape suits you?

At the Westfalenklinik Dortmund, both round and anatomical (teardrop-shaped) implants are available. Which shape makes sense in the individual case depends on the initial anatomy, the desired silhouette and the planned implant position. Both variants can look natural – what matters is the right combination of shape, width, projection and position under or partially under the muscle.

In a personal consultation, Dr. Uwe Herrboldt explains the differences between the two shapes, uses clear examples to show how the implants behave at rest and in motion, and recommends the implant shape that suits your body shape, your desired look and a breast contour that is stable in the long term and looks natural.

Diagram of implant positions: subglandular, dual-plane and submuscular

Placement options: the implant’s “home” shapes the look

  • Subglandular (above the muscle)

    a more pronounced décolleté and a shorter recovery time. With thin coverage, edges may be more noticeable.

  • Dual-plane (partially under the muscle)

    often a balanced solution. The upper pole is shaped softly, while sufficient support remains at the bottom.

  • Submuscular (under the muscle)

    a very soft transition at the top, more muscle pull at first – noticeable especially during sport.

Determining implant size properly: width → projection → volume

The most common mistake is to talk about “millilitres” first. The result depends more on width and projection than on volume alone. That is why the sizing logic follows a fixed order: first, the breast width is measured; it limits the sensible implant diameter. Next, the projection is determined, i.e. how far the implant carries forward. Only then is the volume determined. Two implants with identical millilitres can look completely different on the body if width and projection vary. Keeping to this order guards against lateral overfilling, overly hard transitions or a silhouette that “tips” in motion.

Surface, material, safety: weighing things up soberly

Modern implants contain cohesive silicone gel. It is form-stable and gives a natural feel to the touch. There are surface variants ranging from smooth to micro-/nano-textured. The choice depends on the tissue, position and the individual risk profile. Sweeping judgements fall short – more important are sterile conditions, an atraumatic surgical technique and a precisely fitting size. In this way, the likelihood of capsular reactions can decrease, and the shape is more likely to remain calm in the long term.

An objective view is also part of this: rotation is mainly visibly relevant with anatomical implants. Wrinkling (rippling) can be noticeable with very little soft-tissue coverage, regardless of the shape. The incision and the implant pocket influence contact with bacteria and therefore, indirectly, the risk of complications as well.

Consultation on implant shape at the Westfalenklinik Dortmund

Consultation room of the Westfalenklinik
Consultation room

Would you like to find out whether a round or an anatomical (teardrop-shaped) implant makes more sense for you – and which choice is more harmonious, more natural or aesthetically more suitable for you? At the Westfalenklinik Dortmund, you receive a well-founded, individually tailored consultation. Together with you, our doctors analyse your anatomy, desired look, soft-tissue coverage and implant position, so that you can make a comprehensible and coherent decision on the shape. In your personal consultation appointment, we explain clearly which implant shape suits your silhouette.

Smiling woman in a black bra

Curious to know more?

Write to us and we will call you back:

ProvenExpert Top Recommendation 2026 for the Westfalenklinik98 %Recommendation rateon ProvenExpert
Book consultation

This page is protected by a privacy-friendly spam protection: the check runs in your browser, without tracking and without cookies.

Incision: access, control and scar in balance

The incision in the inframammary fold offers very good control over position and germ reduction and can be hidden well in the fold. A periareolar incision can be aesthetically advantageous if the areola is of a suitable size; however, the natural mixed flora around the areola requires a careful approach. An axillary access moves the scar to the armpit, is technically more demanding and less suitable for certain shapes. The decision is based on anatomy, planned position and shape – not on fashion.

Putting risks into realistic perspective – with a plan A and a plan B

Every breast surgery involves risks. What matters is how transparently they are discussed and how consistently they are managed. This includes: sterile surgical procedures, antibiotic prophylaxis where indicated, precise haemostasis, gentle handling of tissue, choice of size and pocket without “overstretching”, consistent aftercare and realistic expectations. Should problems arise contrary to expectations – such as visible rotation with anatomical implants or bothersome rippling – a clear correction pathway is in place so that quality of life and the result are preserved as far as possible.

Managing expectations: this is what the shape looks like in the first weeks

Immediately after the operation, swelling and muscle pull shape the picture. The breasts may temporarily sit at different heights or look asymmetrical – this normalises gradually. A well-fitted support bra stabilises the shape, the scar needs consistent UV protection, and massages are only carried out once the clinic has given the go-ahead. Sport is increased in stages. As a rule of thumb, the final look shows itself at rest, often only after several weeks. Those who go through this phase calmly will later assess the result more realistically.

Drawings on common misconceptions about breast implants, figures A to D

Common breast implant misconceptions – explained concisely

  • (A): “Round always looks fake.” In dual-plane, very soft contours often develop; a subtle result is entirely achievable.
  • (B): “Anatomical is automatically more natural.” Teardrop shapes create accents at the lower pole, but do not look more natural per se. Size, position and tissue are the real adjusting screws.
  • (C): “More volume solves every shape problem.” Too much volume overstretches tissue, makes the breast wide at the sides and makes transitions appear hard. Fit beats millilitres.
  • (D): “Shape decides everything.” Without the right position and projection, even the supposedly “ideal” shape will not deliver a coherent result.

Decision guide in 6 steps

  1. Define the desired look: what upper/lower fullness, how much projection, which side line? Three reference photos (front, oblique, profile) help.
  2. Measure the initial anatomy: breast width, skin elasticity, soft-tissue coverage, asymmetries, level of sport.
  3. Determine the position: subglandular, dual-plane or submuscular – to match the coverage and the desired look.
  4. Derive the shape: round or anatomical – decided logically from the desired look and the position.
  5. Adjust width & projection: only when both fit is the volume determined.
  6. Plan the incision: inframammary fold as standard, alternatives depending on the situation.

Experience and professional review: what this article is based on

Patients make better decisions when information is experience-based, professionally reviewed and transparent. This article was written by the medical editorial team and reviewed by a specialist before publication. The content follows a clear principle: understandable, complete, without exaggeration. This also includes naming limitations (e.g. the risk of rotation with anatomical implants) and pointing out alternative routes (e.g. adjusting the pocket or size if the desired look is prioritised differently).

The clinic provides measurable quality features – from standardised surgical processes and modern implants to comprehensible aftercare. This creates a framework of information that gives certainty in decision-making.

Your next step: a systematic decision

Bring 2–3 reference photos to your consultation appointment. During the conversation, breast width, skin elasticity, soft-tissue coverage and everyday life (e.g. sport) are recorded. This results in a stringent sequence: determine the position, logically derive the shape, precisely adjust width and projection, determine the volume, plan the incision.

This systematic approach prevents hasty decisions and aims for a silhouette that feels harmonious at rest and in motion – regardless of whether the final choice is round or anatomical.

Frequently asked questions

Are round implants always conspicuous?

No. In the right position – often dual-plane – they can look soft and natural at the top. The projection controls how prominent the décolleté appears.

When are anatomical implants a better fit?

When the upper breast is deliberately meant to remain understated, the soft-tissue coverage is very slim or an asymmetrical initial situation is to be subtly corrected.

How do I find the right size?

Using the three-step rule “width → projection → volume”. This order ensures harmonious proportions and guards against excessive width.

Which incision is usual?

Often the inframammary fold, because it offers very good control over position and germ reduction and the scar can be hidden well.

How long does it take to see the final result?

First impressions emerge after a few weeks; the mature look at rest shows itself later. Swelling and muscle pull subside continuously.

Your question is not among them?

Get in touch with our team now:

ProvenExpert Top Recommendation 2026 for the Westfalenklinik98 %Recommendation rateon ProvenExpert
Book consultation

This page is protected by a privacy-friendly spam protection: the check runs in your browser, without tracking and without cookies.

The building

Your treatment in Dortmund.

Consultation, procedure and aftercare in one place: at the Westfalenklinik on Rosemeyerstraße.

Directions to the clinic
  • Waiting area of the Westfalenklinik01Waiting area
  • Consultation room of the Westfalenklinik02Consultation
  • Operating area of the Westfalenklinik in Dortmund03Operating area
Book consultation

Find your consultation appointment now

Your consultation in 3 steps:

  1. Choose treatment
  2. Choose preferred appointment
  3. confirm by code
Reviews

4.8 out of 5 stars

5,975 reviews of the CGCE Group on ProvenExpert

Reviews by patients of the Westfalenklinik on ProvenExpert, newest first.

Consultation in Dortmund

Let’s get to know each other.

In the first conversation we listen, examine and explain what is possible and what is not. Afterwards you decide in your own time.

Address
Westfalenklinik
Rosemeyerstr. 2–4, 44139 Dortmund
Directions
Consultation hours
Mon–Fri 8 am–8 pmSat 9 am–3 pm
Phone
Mon–Fri 8 am–8 pmSat 9 am–3 pm
Message
Go to the contact form

Phone Mon–Fri 8 am–8 pm, Sat 9 am–3 pmPersonal consultation in Dortmund

0231 54 504 900Ask a questionBook consultation
Ask a question

Write to us.

We will get back to you by email or phone. You can reach us by phone on 0231 54 504 900.

Phone

This page is protected by a privacy-friendly spam protection: the check runs in your browser, without tracking and without cookies.